What We Believe
About Financial Examination
The principles and values that guide every engagement we undertake.
Return HomeOur Foundation
Financial examination serves a specific purpose: to establish what the records show about particular questions or transactions. This purpose requires methodology that produces findings others can verify and challenge if they disagree.
We believe the work should speak for itself through clear documentation of what was examined, how it was analyzed, and what conclusions the evidence supports. This foundation shapes everything we do.
Our values center on serving the examination's purpose rather than serving convenience or expediency. When these priorities conflict, we choose the approach that produces defensible findings over the approach that delivers them faster.
Good forensic accounting is ultimately about creating a reliable record of what exists in the financial data.
Our Vision for the Practice
We envision forensic accounting as a discipline that earns trust through methodology rather than through reputation or credentials alone. The work should demonstrate its own reliability through transparent documentation and logical analysis.
This vision requires patience. Thorough examination takes appropriate time. Documentation to professional standards requires care. Maintaining objectivity demands discipline when findings don't align with expectations.
We believe transformation happens when financial matters are examined properly the first time rather than repeatedly revisited as questions arise. Clear findings reduce uncertainty and allow informed decision-making.
Our approach aims to produce work that withstands scrutiny not because we're skilled at defending it, but because the methodology and documentation make the findings self-evident to those who examine them.
Core Beliefs That Guide Our Work
Evidence Over Assumption
We believe conclusions should emerge from documented evidence rather than from assumptions about what likely happened. When evidence is insufficient to support a conclusion, we state that limitation rather than speculating.
Methodology Matters
Sound methodology produces defensible findings. We believe the approach taken should be transparent and replicable, allowing others to understand how we reached our conclusions and to verify our work if they choose.
Documentation Creates Accountability
Thorough documentation serves multiple purposes. It allows review of our work, provides a record for future reference, and creates accountability for the conclusions we reach. Documentation standards reflect our commitment to the work's integrity.
Objectivity Requires Discipline
Maintaining objectivity means documenting findings that don't support preferred narratives as thoroughly as those that do. It means acknowledging limitations and alternative interpretations. This discipline distinguishes examination from advocacy.
Service Through Clarity
We serve clients best by providing clear, honest findings they can rely upon for decision-making. This sometimes means delivering findings that don't align with hopes or expectations, but clarity serves better than reassurance when stakes are high.
Professional Standards Protect Everyone
Following professional standards isn't about compliance for its own sake. Standards exist because they produce work that can be trusted. Adhering to them protects both the client's interests and the integrity of the findings.
How Beliefs Translate to Practice
In Our Scoping
We define scope based on what questions need answering and what evidence exists to address them. When scope needs adjustment as examination proceeds, we discuss this openly rather than expanding work without authorization or limiting it to stay within budget.
In Our Analysis
We follow documented procedures designed to be appropriate for the questions being examined. When findings suggest additional testing would be warranted, we perform that testing. When data limitations prevent definitive conclusions, we state those limitations clearly.
In Our Documentation
Our work papers document not just what we found but how we found it. This allows independent review and provides a record that retains value over time. Documentation follows professional standards regardless of whether anyone is likely to review it.
In Our Reporting
Reports explain findings in language appropriate for the intended audience. Technical details are included when needed for understanding, but jargon doesn't substitute for clear explanation. Limitations and alternative interpretations are stated rather than omitted.
In Our Client Relationships
We communicate honestly about what we can and cannot determine from the available evidence. When findings don't support preferred narratives, we deliver them directly but respectfully. Our commitment is to the accuracy of findings, not to telling clients what they want to hear.
Respecting Individual Circumstances
While our methodology remains consistent, its application adapts to each situation's specific needs. Not every matter requires the same depth of examination. Not every client needs the same level of explanation or support.
We listen to understand what questions actually need answering, what constraints exist, and what the findings need to accomplish. This understanding shapes how we approach the work while maintaining the standards that make findings defensible.
Respect for individual circumstances means acknowledging that financial examination can be stressful. Matters requiring forensic accounting often involve disputes, investigations, or other difficult situations. We approach these circumstances with appropriate sensitivity while maintaining our objectivity about the financial questions being examined.
Thoughtful Evolution of Practice
Financial examination methodology evolves as technology changes, as professional standards develop, and as we learn from experience. We welcome improvements that enhance the quality or efficiency of our work without compromising its integrity.
Innovation in our practice means finding better ways to document clearly, analyze thoroughly, or communicate findings accessibly. It doesn't mean abandoning proven methodology for the sake of novelty or adopting tools that compromise documentation standards.
We balance respect for established professional practices with openness to better approaches. The test is whether a change serves the work's purpose: producing findings others can verify and rely upon.
Our Commitment to Honesty
Integrity in forensic accounting means documenting what exists rather than what might be convenient. It means acknowledging when evidence doesn't support conclusions, even when those conclusions would benefit the engagement.
Transparency about our process builds trust. Clients should understand how we work, what we can and cannot determine, and what limitations affect our findings. This openness allows informed decisions about whether to proceed and what weight to give the results.
We're accountable for the quality of our work. When questions arise about our methodology or findings, we address them directly. When we make errors, we acknowledge them and determine their impact on conclusions.
Trust is earned through consistent adherence to stated principles, not through claims of expertise or credentials.
Working Together Effectively
Financial examination often involves collaboration with legal counsel, other experts, or client personnel. Effective collaboration requires clear communication about roles, expectations, and findings as they develop.
We work as part of teams when engagements require it, contributing our expertise while respecting others' areas of responsibility. Our role is to address the financial questions; we defer to legal counsel on legal matters and to other specialists within their domains.
Good collaboration means being responsive to reasonable requests while maintaining the standards necessary for defensible work. It means explaining our methodology when questions arise and being willing to revisit conclusions if new evidence emerges.
Lasting Impact of Quality Work
We approach each engagement thinking about how the work will serve over time. Financial examination findings may be referenced years after completion. Documentation prepared hastily becomes difficult to understand or defend later.
Long-term thinking means investing appropriate time in documentation even when immediate pressures encourage shortcuts. It means maintaining standards consistently rather than adjusting them based on perceived importance of individual engagements.
The lasting impact of quality work extends beyond individual engagements. When findings prove reliable under scrutiny, when documentation remains useful years later, and when methodology withstands challenge, these outcomes reinforce the value of adhering to professional standards.
Work done properly today continues to serve its purpose as circumstances evolve and as questions arise over time.
What These Principles Mean for You
You Can Expect
- • Findings based on documented evidence rather than assumptions or speculation
- • Transparent methodology you can understand and verify if needed
- • Documentation that meets professional standards and withstands scrutiny
- • Honest communication about what we can determine and what limitations exist
- • Objectivity about findings regardless of whether they support preferred narratives
- • Work that retains its value as circumstances evolve over time
Our Promise
We commit to maintaining these standards consistently across all engagements. The approach we describe here isn't reserved for high-profile matters or larger engagements. Every matter receives the same methodical attention, thorough documentation, and objective analysis.
This consistency means you can rely on our findings because they emerge from a proven methodology applied rigorously, not from case-by-case judgments about how much care a particular matter deserves.
Discuss How Our Approach Applies to Your Matter
If these principles align with what you need from financial examination, we can discuss your specific situation and explain how our methodology would address your questions.
Begin a Conversation